[1] Methods for quantification of in vivo changes in protein ubiquitination following proteasome and deubiquitinase inhibition.
Udeshi ND, Mani DR, Eisenhaure T, Mertins P, Jaffe JD, Clauser KR, Hacohen N, Carr SA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 May;11(5):148-59. [
PMID: 22505724]
[2] A proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles.
Wagner SA, Beli P, Weinert BT, Nielsen ML, Cox J, Mann M, Choudhary C.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Oct;10(10):M111.013284. [
PMID: 21890473]
[3] Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome.
Kim W, Bennett EJ, Huttlin EL, Guo A, Li J, Possemato A, Sowa ME, Rad R, Rush J, Comb MJ, Harper JW, Gygi SP.
Mol Cell. 2011 Oct 21;44(2):325-40. [
PMID: 21906983]
[4] Refined preparation and use of anti-diglycine remnant (K-ε-GG) antibody enables routine quantification of 10,000s of ubiquitination sites in single proteomics experiments.
Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Mertins P, Kuhn E, Mani DR, Qiao JW, Carr SA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Mar;12(3):825-31. [
PMID: 23266961]
[5] Integrated proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications by serial enrichment.
Mertins P, Qiao JW, Patel J, Udeshi ND, Clauser KR, Mani DR, Burgess MW, Gillette MA, Jaffe JD, Carr SA.
Nat Methods. 2013 Jul;10(7):634-7. [
PMID: 23749302]
[6] Mass spectrometric analysis of lysine ubiquitylation reveals promiscuity at site level.
Danielsen JM, Sylvestersen KB, Bekker-Jensen S, Szklarczyk D, Poulsen JW, Horn H, Jensen LJ, Mailand N, Nielsen ML.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Mar;10(3):M110.003590. [
PMID: 21139048]