[1] Refined preparation and use of anti-diglycine remnant (K-ε-GG) antibody enables routine quantification of 10,000s of ubiquitination sites in single proteomics experiments.
Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Mertins P, Kuhn E, Mani DR, Qiao JW, Carr SA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Mar;12(3):825-31. [
PMID: 23266961]
[2] Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome.
Kim W, Bennett EJ, Huttlin EL, Guo A, Li J, Possemato A, Sowa ME, Rad R, Rush J, Comb MJ, Harper JW, Gygi SP.
Mol Cell. 2011 Oct 21;44(2):325-40. [
PMID: 21906983]
[3] Methods for quantification of in vivo changes in protein ubiquitination following proteasome and deubiquitinase inhibition.
Udeshi ND, Mani DR, Eisenhaure T, Mertins P, Jaffe JD, Clauser KR, Hacohen N, Carr SA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 May;11(5):148-59. [
PMID: 22505724]
[4] Site-specific identification of SUMO-2 targets in cells reveals an inverted SUMOylation motif and a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif.
Matic I, Schimmel J, Hendriks IA, van Santen MA, van de Rijke F, van Dam H, Gnad F, Mann M, Vertegaal AC.
Mol Cell. 2010 Aug 27;39(4):641-52. [
PMID: 20797634]
[5] A proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles.
Wagner SA, Beli P, Weinert BT, Nielsen ML, Cox J, Mann M, Choudhary C.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Oct;10(10):M111.013284. [
PMID: 21890473]
[6] Mass spectrometric analysis of lysine ubiquitylation reveals promiscuity at site level.
Danielsen JM, Sylvestersen KB, Bekker-Jensen S, Szklarczyk D, Poulsen JW, Horn H, Jensen LJ, Mailand N, Nielsen ML.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Mar;10(3):M110.003590. [
PMID: 21139048]